![carrack star citizen carrack star citizen](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4LxRM0B6Yc4/maxresdefault.jpg)
I think the toilets and showers need to be adjacent to the sleeping area, and there is no need for a separate relaxation room, a pool table, a spa, a massage salon. Why an exploration ship (Pisces isn't really a snub) has such a limited view? While you could fit the Aurora into the hangar, I would prefer Pisces to have the unblocked view of the sides and the bottom, - you even have this on Ursa rover. Current view resembles a view in Terrapin's cockpit, but that's a different purpose ship, with as much armor and protection as possible. you should be able to view everything, including sides and bottom. It should have a view comparable to the Carrack or the Aurora, i.e. In particular, I don't like Pisces's view from the cockpit. Likely an elevator, which ideally should have a functionality of (or be adjacent to an interlock with a functionality of) decontaminating, like what you've got on the med-bay entrance. There should be a smaller and quicker point of entry. It takes a lot of time to get it open and closed, vents a large room in the ship, as well as poses a threat, since an enemy, or hostile creatures/bacteria/viruses (it's exploring new worlds) can get in. elevator.Ĭurrently there is only one way to get into the ship from the ground - and that's the front ramp. The bathroom could be smaller and the bedroom larger, and not as empty.Ĥ) Lack of a small ground entry point, e.g.
![carrack star citizen carrack star citizen](https://video-images.vice.com/articles/5b4e0e36b097c1000c564067/lede/1531842272637-tKUNfP5.jpeg)
While I understand it's a military ship, but even on a military ship why the captain would have worse living conditions than the crew members? The crew sleeping room and bunks are better. Currently I can only see up and sideways, but can't see what's below. Moreover, the commander's place should have a view downwards. It could just be functionality, so that the round table can also project a flat (or 3d) round area map. There is plenty of room to move the seat forward, and there already is a rail on which the seat can move forward.Īlso, I would still want the holotable for flat (or 3d) area maps. I would like the pilot seat to go more forward, otherwise my side view is blocked by air intakes. Maybe you could even have an adjustable gear - make it short when you have an even flat surface, and make it long when the terrain is rough. The current tiny gear makes the ship not level when you land elsewhere than a landing pad. I still believe that the ability to land almost on any terrain is an essential feature of an explorer ship.Īlso, 4 supports would make the ship more stable, and you may be able to level it better.
CARRACK STAR CITIZEN PATCH
Look at the original long landing gear - it would have no problem with landing on rugged terrain when you can't find a patch of even surface and have to land with rocks, trees, pits and other obstacles in your way. So, some small rocks can make your landing impossible. It's a large ship, but it has a tiny landing gear. I've had some hard time to land Carrack on rugged terrain. So, what I don't like in the Carrack's current state: And some of these points are still relevant on my opinion. I have raised some of these points back in 2018 when I've seen the updates on the Carrack. While the Carrack is a great ship, which was supposed to be the king of exploration, there are a few things I don't like about it's current state, so wanted to check what do you think.